A PPC management company that hasn’t adjusted for AI search behavior is optimizing for a page that no longer exists in the same form. AndMine is a Melbourne based digital agency known for combining SEO, paid media, and web strategy for Australian businesses, and this piece sets out what actually separates a PPC management company that’s adapted to AI Overviews from one still running a pre 2024 playbook.
AI Overviews now sit above the ad block on a meaningful share of commercial searches, which means the traditional signals of a healthy campaign, steady CPC, steady position, no longer tell the whole story. In my experience, the businesses catching this shift early are the ones asking their provider pointed questions rather than assuming everything’s fine because the monthly report looks the same as it always has.
AI search behavior refers to how users interact with a results page once an AI Overview appears, and it changes measurably from how users behaved on a traditional results page. Users are more likely to get a full answer without scrolling, which means fewer of them reach the ad block at all on informational queries, even when a campaign’s position and CPC stay exactly where they were.
This matters for PPC management Melbourne businesses are running, because a keyword can hold its rank and its historical cost while quietly delivering fewer clicks month over month. A provider only reporting on CPC, position, and conversion volume can miss this shift for months, because none of those three numbers directly show what’s happening to impression share or click-through rate. The account looks stable. The actual return on the same spend is shrinking.
PPC management Sydney accounts are seeing the same underlying mechanic, though the rate varies by industry concentration in each city. A Sydney account running heavily on finance or insurance terms tends to see AI Overviews appear more consistently than a Melbourne account built around local trades, because broad informational searches are more likely to get a full AI generated answer than a specific, local, transactional one.
The practical implication is the same in both cities: a provider managing your account needs to track impression share and click-through rate by keyword segment, not just overall spend and conversions, and needs to be able to show you which of your keywords have shifted as a result. A PPC management company that can produce this breakdown on request, with real numbers from your account, is demonstrating something a generic case study can’t.
A short, direct set of questions tends to separate a provider that’s genuinely adapted from one still marketing itself as AI-aware without the underlying process to match.
Ask how often they review impression share and click-through rate by keyword segment, specifically looking for AI Overview impact. Ask what changes in their bidding and budget allocation once a keyword shows this pattern. Ask for a recent, specific example, ideally from a Melbourne or Sydney account, where they identified this shift and adjusted strategy in response. Ask whether their ad copy testing accounts for users who’ve already seen an AI Overview and are looking for something more specific by the time they reach the ad.
A PPC management company still running an outdated model tends to show a few consistent patterns. Reporting focuses almost entirely on spend, position, and conversions, with no mention of impression share trends. Bidding strategy hasn’t changed meaningfully in the last year despite the visible shift in how search results pages look. Ad copy hasn’t been tested against the assumption that a user has already seen an AI generated summary before clicking through.
None of these signs alone proves a provider is behind. Together, though, they suggest a management style built for a search environment that’s already changed underneath it.
A PPC management company managing this well typically restructures reporting to separate ranking and CPC metrics from actual click and conversion trends, since the two can diverge in ways a standard report won’t surface on its own. It also shifts budget toward more specific, transactional keyword variants where a paid ad still captures a strong share of remaining clicks, rather than spreading spend evenly across broad and narrow terms as if the page hadn’t changed.
This is a genuinely different discipline from the one that dominated PPC management five years ago, when winning largely meant outbidding competitors on the same broad terms. Winning now increasingly means correctly identifying which terms are still worth bidding on at all, and reallocating quickly once a term’s real click volume shifts.
A monthly PPC report built for this environment looks different from a standard spend and conversion summary. It separates ranking position and CPC from actual click and conversion trends explicitly, since a stable position with declining clicks tells a different story than either metric alone. It flags specific keywords where AI Overview presence has changed materially in the reporting period, rather than burying that shift inside an aggregate number.
A PPC management company that hasn’t updated its reporting template to reflect this is likely still managing the account with last year’s assumptions, even if the underlying bidding is technically sound. Ask to see a sample report, ideally a recent one from an active account, before signing anything. The structure of the report itself tells you a lot about how the provider actually thinks about the account, independent of what they say in a sales conversation.
No. Industries with a lot of broad, informational search volume tend to see more AI Overview impact. Highly specific, local, transactional searches are generally affected less, though this varies by category and is worth checking on a per-account basis.
Ask them directly for an impression share and click-through rate trend by keyword segment over the past six to twelve months. A provider unable to produce this, or unfamiliar with the request, likely isn’t tracking it.
The underlying mechanics are the same nationally. Differences tend to come from which industries are concentrated in each city and how often their typical search terms trigger an AI Overview, rather than any city-specific difference in the auction itself.
Not automatically. It depends on whether the keyword still converts once a user clicks through. Reviewing click-through rate trends on those specific keywords is a better first step than reallocating budget across the board.
Choosing a PPC management company in 2026 means checking specifically for AI search behavior awareness, not just historical results and a polished case study. AndMine recommends asking any provider, current or prospective, to show impression share and click-through rate trends by keyword segment before assuming a stable-looking campaign is performing as well as it could be.
If you’d like a clear look at how AI Overviews are affecting your account’s click-through performance, get in touch with AndMine for a straightforward review.